The SHRMP.bio strategy

Why a two-person shrimp startup is not building a shrimp farm.

Everyone we spoke to in the early days had the same objection: you cannot compete with cheap imported prawns, so there is no business here. They were right about the prawns and wrong about the business.

SHRMP.bio is not a prawn farm, and is very unlikely to become one. The reasoning took two years, a set of future scenarios, a surprising detour through national security, and a close look at what has happened to the best-funded companies in the field. This is that reasoning, in order — not the order it was written in, but the order it makes sense in.

Two movements: first, the world the strategy answers to; then, the strategy itself.

I — The world we are building in

The forces that make the near term look impossible and the long term look inevitable.

A future arriving early, and the national stakes underneath it.

  1. Scenarios for 2050, arriving early A 2024 forecast of the food future, turning up two decades ahead of schedule — and from the direction I did not expect.
  2. Australia says it has no food-security problem. I am not convinced. The Food half. An export surplus that depends entirely on trade staying open — and the nutrient gap underneath it.
  3. The day I agreed with an admiral The Security half. Why, in an uncertain world, what cannot easily be taken is what is most worth owning — and why you start building it two decades early.

II — What we concluded

Own the layer underneath the industry.

Not a better farm — the layer every farm depends on.

  1. Everyone is building a better shrimp box. We aim to build what every box needs. The core move: not a better farm, but the biology and breeding layer every farm depends on and none can make for itself.
  2. The work worth most in 2050 is the work no one wants to pay for in 2026 Why the near-term economics do not close, why that was never the bet, and why the window to build it is now.
  3. On three continents, the state is paying Land-based prawn farms exist where governments fund them — not where the market does. The highest-leverage place to put public money is the IP layer, not another farm.
  4. Two companies proved the market is real. Then production nearly killed them both. SwissShrimp and Atarraya settle the demand question — and prove the fight that decides who lives is the cost of every kilo. Which is why we are looking for a research home.
More from SHRMP.bio on The Plot →